Warning - Heavy Political Comment
We're off to - lets say simpler - political climates soon, but I can't leave without one last op-ed on the situation here. If you've been reading my post, I think you'll know which side of the fence I fall (if you want to skip the politics then skip to the next post).
I must put a disclaimer in here. These are largely my musings and are based on only limited research so I can't say I'm 100% on all the facts - it's the way I see things here.The Wall
Speaking of fences, I've been here for a few months and haven't even blogged about that yet. What's in a name right. If you're on the Israeli side, you'd call it the Security Fence and praise the increased security it brings. If you're on the Palestinian side, you might call it the Apartheid Wall and complain how it is being used to annex Palestinian land.
The zone of the fence is a 60- to 100-yard-wide combination of barbed wire or chain-link fences, ditches, roads, 8m high concrete walls (that's over twice the height of the Berlin wall), razor wire, watchtowers, cameras and electronic sensors.
Fair enough, if the Israeli's want a secure border then go ahead. My main issue (and that of international law for that matter) with the wall is that it's not on the internationally recognised border. That's the Green Line I mentioned in the history post. Instead, the wall snakes its way into and around the West Bank, and is effectively annexing large parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. On the other hand, hardline Israelis would say sticking up the wall amounts to giving up on the Jewish claim to the whole of the the historical Land of Israel. The rest of the world (me included) don't agree with this and believe that the Palestinians have a right to self determination and that Israel should withdraw to the Green Line.
In this map from UN OCHA, the green line is, well, the Green Line. The Red line is fence constructed thus far, and the black line is the planned route. As you can see, large chunks of Palestine, and all of East Jerusalem are carved out. Added to this is the fact that the white areas are closed military areas. It doesn't leave much of Palestine to the Palestinians!
The Two State Solution is supposed to see Israel move back to within the Green Line and for Palestine to become an independent state. Sounds logical. However, the facts on the ground suggest to me that the Israelis aren't that serious about doing this. Firstly there's the wall. If I were eventually going to move back to the green line, I wouldn't build my wall inside my neighbor's territory. But this is to protect the settlements, the Israelis say. And that brings me to the second problem.
The Settlements
If you've turned on the news at all in the last week then you'll have heard about these.
Firstly, hat's off to the Israeli PR machine. Somehow we have come to know the Palestinian extremists as, well, extremists. But we call the Jewish extremist either a settler or an ultra-orthodox. Sounds a bit like the romantic notion of the pilgrims heading off to the New World. It's not. These guys are every bit as hard line as their opponents.
Now, I'm being a little unfair here as I think most settlers are economic rather than ideological. However, those settling outposts are definitely on the ideological end of the scale, believing that Israel has a historical right to the West Bank, and a Jewish state ie bugger off Palestinians, we belong here, not you. (Hamas on the other hand has the opposite view. Hmm, no wonder this place is a tinder box.) I think/hope that most people just want peace and agree that a two state solution is the only way this can be achieved. Hamas's methods are well documented, but you have to dig a little deeper to find out what the settlers get up to.
Setting up an outpost 101: First you, and a bunch of like-minded folk, select a bit of Palestinian land - preferably on a hill top - for security reasons of course. Then, under the cover of darkness you move in. If you've got some financial backing, this might involve trucking in a bunch of demountables, if not, then just camping in your car will do. An essential part of your kit will be arms - you'll want plenty of firepower - for security reasons. You don't want any of those pesky land owners coming about asking for their land back. There you have it, you've got an outpost. Now, for security you'll need to keep the local farmers away from any nearby fields. You can encourage this by taking pot shots, throwing up a barbed wire fence, or just by cutting down their olive trees - you get a better line of site that way. If you're in a "legitimate/established" settlement, then the government does all this for you. Much more civilized.
As I mentioned, most settlers are economic, having been attracted by high quality cheap housing. As such, moving this lot on would be pretty straight forward if the government were will to resettle them in similar circumstances on the correct side of the green line. It's the remaining few hard-liners that would make the international headlines (as they did in Gaza a few years ago). Of course this requires political will, and the events of the last week suggest there isn't much of that.
Speaking of the UN, since 2006 there have been 3 resolutions denouncing all settlements in occupied territories. In 2006 the results were 162 for, 8 against and 10 abstentions. In 2007, 165 / 7 / 5. In 2008 171 / 6 / 2. It's interesting to note that Australia stood with Israel and the US to vote against the first two resolutions. The other dissenting world powers were the likes of these heavy hitters: Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Tuvalu. Australia finally got it's act together on the last vote - maybe no longer the US's deputy in the Pacific?
Another issue is the location of the settlements. If you have a look at the above map, you'll notice the settlements (purple shading) effectively bisect the West Bank into 3 parts. The related settler roads, security fences and road blocks severly restrict Palestinians ability to move up and down the West Bank - and that's not even mentioning getting to Gaza. Follow this link if you'd like to download a map book from UN OCHA showing more detail on settlements, access restrictions, walls etc (warning - the file is fairly large). And here is a BBC article discussing settlements (check my facts since it's been a while since I read it!)
Refugees
The last big piece of the Palestinian/Israel issue is the issue of "right of return" for Palestinian refugees. There's been a lot of wars - and a lot of refugees as a result. The refugee "camps" in Gaza, the West Bank and neighboring countries have been around so long that they now resemble high density concrete housing projects. My understanding is that the Israelis don't want them back because (a) it would cause a property right nightmare since the refugees land has been taken over and (b) it would tip the demographic scales in favor of the non-Jewish people inside Israel - since the Palestinians have been breeding like rabbits, and the Israelis haven't.
So where does all this leave me?
Apartheid
noun. A system of segregation or discrimination on the grounds of race.
After being here for a while, I think that about sums it up. Where you live, what roads you can drive on, where you can travel to, where you build - or whether you can build for that matter. Checkpoints, walls, security/police harassment/arrest, property rights and law, the Gaza Blockade. I've seen all of this in the short time I've been here and I can't think of any other word for it. It's and insidious undercurrent to everything that goes on here. I can only hope that one day things can change as they did in South Africa, and in Berlin. One day.